Cushionaire home page, Figma vs live, section by section, desktop + mobile, adversarially verified. v1 = original build, v2 = post-fix rebuild — same method.
| Severity | v1 · original build | v2 · post-fix rebuild |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | 16 | 4 |
| High | 21 | 23 |
| Medium | 31 | 40 |
| Low | 27 | 36 |
| Total | 95 | 103 |
Both diffed with the identical current method (16-agent per-band adversarial pass vs the same Figma home frames, reference composited on white). The rebuild (v2) cut the serious issues — Critical 16→4 (the original’s empty carousels / missing product, lifestyle & testimonial images are largely resolved). Placeholder “LOREM” category copy is editable from the Shopify theme editor (a copy task, not a build defect) and is excluded from the findings; the remaining criticals are a missing decorative photo-in-letter cutout and two mobile carousels rendered as vertical stacks. v2’s higher total is mostly Medium/Low styling & spacing nits surfaced by the exhaustive pass.